Back to Feed
总结
围绕“特朗普是否为石油而入侵委内瑞拉”的争议，Vox等媒体文章与评论汇集了多方观点：有人将美方对委内瑞拉的行动描述为军事入侵或政权更迭尝试，认为其体现“炮舰外交”回潮；也有人强调此举在国际法、主权与规则层面引发严重疑问，显示强国可随意改写边界。相关讨论聚焦动机（能源利益、国内政治）与后果（地区安全动荡、外交对立加剧、规则可信度受损）。
正文
Did Trump really invade Venezuela for oil? Vox Opinion | Gunboat Diplomacy Is Back. What Could Go Wrong? The New York Times Trump's coup in Venezuela didn't just break the rules - it showed there aren't any. We'll all regret that | Nesrine Malik The Guardian We'd be better off without Trump like Venezuela is better off without Maduro | Letters The Columbus Dispatch Law professor examines the questions raised by the U.S. invasion of Venezuela NPR
发布时间：