Back to Feed
总结
印度最高法院近日在涉及被控依据《非法活动（预防）法》(UAPA)起诉的保释审理中强调，法院在该阶段不应评估被告方辩护材料，而应主要审查检方是否已呈现“表面成立”的指控。该立场在德里骚乱相关被告乌马尔·哈立德案的判决语境中被讨论，被部分评论视为抬高保释门槛、削弱对羁押必要性的审查，并可能形成可被援引的司法先例。在此前部分被告获最高法院救济后，另有涉案人员以“同等对待”为由继续提出保释申请，相关政治人物与舆论也出现声援与批评交织的反应。
正文
In UAPA Bail Hearing, Defence Not To Be Considered; Only See If Prosecution Has Shown Prima Facie Case :... Live Law Supreme Court's Judgment In Umar Khalid Case Is A Disturbing Precedent Live Law After relief from Supreme Court to others, another Delhi riots accused files bail plea seeking parity The Hindu "You Will Rise": Mahua Moitra Shares Poem For Umar Khalid After Bail Denial NDTV Can We Fault Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid for Dreaming of a Better World? TheWire.in
发布时间：